<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Google Search Layout&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://devrich.com/blog/2010/02/23/google-search-layout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://devrich.com/blog/2010/02/23/google-search-layout/</link>
	<description>Mass Domain Development and Monetization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:07:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: whisperpntr</title>
		<link>http://devrich.com/blog/2010/02/23/google-search-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>whisperpntr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 04:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devrich.com/?p=432#comment-822</guid>
		<description>Definitely don&#039;t like it.  I spent the last 15 minutes trying to turn the thing off but realized this is a new test feature.

My advise?  Don&#039;t fix something that worked just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely don&#8217;t like it.  I spent the last 15 minutes trying to turn the thing off but realized this is a new test feature.</p>
<p>My advise?  Don&#8217;t fix something that worked just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Orchard</title>
		<link>http://devrich.com/blog/2010/02/23/google-search-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devrich.com/?p=432#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Personally - I think this trip to candyland is a bit extreme. Google has been known for simple, yet functional search. Adding this much bright color is harsh on the eyes and doesn&#039;t provide enough compelling contrast as is needed. At least Bing nailed the colors for their site - Google, what gives? I&#039;m fairly certain that I&#039;m not going to be the only one to start jumping ship if you&#039;re going to start using bright colors on a white background. Secondly, your font sizes....c&#039;mon - take a serious look at it. You&#039;re diluting the significance of search. Period. Making the typeset the same size as the title&#039;s for SERP&#039;s and disabling the ability to &quot;hide&quot; that menu is a sad move. So long....user friendliness. On a last note, Bing&#039;s sidebar is actually useful - and presents significantly more accurate information that can be used - not a horrible duplication of the top menu that Google is known for.

Remember...these are my views - not yours...but if your&#039;s match - let me know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally &#8211; I think this trip to candyland is a bit extreme. Google has been known for simple, yet functional search. Adding this much bright color is harsh on the eyes and doesn&#8217;t provide enough compelling contrast as is needed. At least Bing nailed the colors for their site &#8211; Google, what gives? I&#8217;m fairly certain that I&#8217;m not going to be the only one to start jumping ship if you&#8217;re going to start using bright colors on a white background. Secondly, your font sizes&#8230;.c&#8217;mon &#8211; take a serious look at it. You&#8217;re diluting the significance of search. Period. Making the typeset the same size as the title&#8217;s for SERP&#8217;s and disabling the ability to &#8220;hide&#8221; that menu is a sad move. So long&#8230;.user friendliness. On a last note, Bing&#8217;s sidebar is actually useful &#8211; and presents significantly more accurate information that can be used &#8211; not a horrible duplication of the top menu that Google is known for.</p>
<p>Remember&#8230;these are my views &#8211; not yours&#8230;but if your&#8217;s match &#8211; let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasha</title>
		<link>http://devrich.com/blog/2010/02/23/google-search-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devrich.com/?p=432#comment-293</guid>
		<description>As long as my SERPs positions improve, kudos. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as my SERPs positions improve, kudos. <img src='http://devrich.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevRich</title>
		<link>http://devrich.com/blog/2010/02/23/google-search-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>DevRich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devrich.com/?p=432#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Google Wonder Wheel is currently not available in Chrome as well...

Luke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Wonder Wheel is currently not available in Chrome as well&#8230;</p>
<p>Luke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevRich</title>
		<link>http://devrich.com/blog/2010/02/23/google-search-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>DevRich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devrich.com/?p=432#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Yeah I agree... Not 100% in love with the small fonts for the SERP pages...

Luke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I agree&#8230; Not 100% in love with the small fonts for the SERP pages&#8230;</p>
<p>Luke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Domainer</title>
		<link>http://devrich.com/blog/2010/02/23/google-search-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devrich.com/?p=432#comment-289</guid>
		<description>*

On ie now, at least in Eastern Europe.

It looks like Yahoo&#039;s search page, but without the trending items.

It&#039;s okay, I suppose. It&#039;s nothing to rave about, but it&#039;s nothing to cry about. It&#039;s more like a lateral move.

*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*</p>
<p>On ie now, at least in Eastern Europe.</p>
<p>It looks like Yahoo&#8217;s search page, but without the trending items.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s okay, I suppose. It&#8217;s nothing to rave about, but it&#8217;s nothing to cry about. It&#8217;s more like a lateral move.</p>
<p>*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

